8/30/2023 0 Comments Dren movieThe film's so-called brilliant genetic engineers learn nothing from their past experiments as interaction with Dren becomes even more brutal, and far more offensive. Those sighs from Oscar night are transformed into audible laughter as Brody soon is making one of the worst on-screen decisions of his film career. Mind you, French actress Delphine Chaneac delivers a marvelous performance, her efforts combining with computer generated imagery to create some sort of feminine creature with rabbit legs, hidden wings and a poisonous stinger on the end of her tail.īrody may be best known not for winning an Academy Award for "The Pianist," but rather for delivering that old-fashioned, suave kiss to Halle Berry before accepting his award.Įven diehard fans will wish he'd stopped with just a dance and a good night kiss here. And while she claims to not want children, she's soon mothering this creation - which she names Dren - with a dress and makeup. With Brody and Polley interacting more with their creation, it becomes increasingly clear that screenwriters should have taken the time to express both characters' backgrounds. except it is not blue.Īs it develops, it becomes visually evident that Elsa made ridiculous decisions before injecting the human DNA. The infant version might very well have been born on Pandora in James Cameron's "Avatar". The same executives in favor of closing all genetic studies also have no idea that their two scientists have crossed an ethical boundary and, without permission, successfully have linked human DNA with the source material that initially resulted in Fred and Ginger.Īs the film progresses, audiences are left to wonder how many life forms - and which ones - have contributed to the latest form born in the lab. Little does anyone know ahead of time that Ginger has not finished adapting to "her" new environment. That said, company executives have a colossal disaster ahead of them when they set up probably the worst demonstration for potential investors in the history of science. The scientific possibilities are endless. When introduced, it appears these two new organisms might even want to mate. Meanwhile, it's high-fives all around in the laboratory when the act of combining different animals' DNA results in a pair of growing, squishy, worm-like creatures that Polley, who must love film musicals, insists on naming Fred and Ginger. Their hearts are in the right place, even if the corporation also is thinking about covering expenses and making millions. Instead, the picture opens with both scientists working in the private sector, financed by a corporation that hopes new organisms also will result in patents for new materials that could have medicinal effects on dreaded diseases. Just what Clive and Elsa are using as their original source material is never thoroughly established. They also totally ruin the picture's creepy opening. His final confrontations are messy, at least one in disgusting proportions despite being telegraphed in advance, and hardly original. Natali takes a too-easy detour and, perhaps seeking eye-opening controversy, is bound to be greeted by uncomfortable, but derisive laughter instead. He had to have been thinking of Colin Clive and Elsa Lanchester co-starring in 1935's "Bride of Frankenstein," wouldn't you think?īut whereas the genetic engineering story, combined with human drama and unforeseen human mistakes, appears to be carrying us toward a thrilling finale, the film's last half hour finds sci-fi seguing into horror and a cinematic train wreck. Natali even earns a grin by giving the names Clive and Elsa to his lovebird scientists, played by Oscar winner Adrien Brody and Oscar nominee Sarah Polley. Writer-director Vincenzo Natali's "Splice" opens as a long-awaited, intelligent science fiction effort, introducing characters inclined to look past the ethics of genetic splicing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |